Official Website of Dr. Jose V. Abueva


Home arrow Postings arrow Postings arrow Kennedy's illness kept him from attending the funeral of his sister, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, a leadi
Sunday, 05 September 2010
Main Menu
Home
Commentaries
Postings
Links
About JVA
Writings/Publications
Search
Newsflash
  

Public Affairs: a Boholano View

  By Jose “Pepe” Abueva

The Best Time for Charter Change is Now:With President Benigno S. Aquino III.

  

   

 “The President’s legitimacy and high popular trust will make his initiative to change the Constitution most welcome and the least suspicious.” 

  

Wrong time for ChaCha?

  

In its editorial on July 8, the Philippine Daily Inquirer declared it was the wrong time to consider Charter change, and gave these reasons.

  

There was no mandate to President Benigno S. Aquino to change the Constitution. His election even meant rejection of former President Arroyo’s failed ChaCha initiative which she has revived in her new proposal as a Representative. It would be distracting to President Aquino whose priority should be to push his legislative agenda. Better to have  his proposed commission to study the need for Charter change, and to effect the change in connection with the elections in 2013.

  

No, now is the best time!

  

On the contrary, I strongly believe that now is the best time. The initiative for Charter change is a supreme act of the national leadership. Our new President’s legitimacy and high popular trust (88 per cent according to the latest survey of the Social Weather Stations) will make his initiative to change the Constitution most welcome and the least suspicious.  

  

As a student of politics and governance, I believe it is the primordial duty of President Benigno S. Aquino III to initiate policy and institutional changes in our Constitution by asking Congress to act soon after as he settles down in his presidency. No need for a commission as he has said, or a referendum to consult the people on the question.

  

A constitutional convention would be the most acceptable mode of Charter change because of lingering distrust of Congress. Why? Unfortunately, with some exceptions, our representatives and senators are no longer held in high regard as they used to be. Right or wrong, most of them are seen as self-serving, untrustworthy, and ineffectual as political leaders.

 

 

 

At the latest 2013 would be a good time for a national plebiscite on the proposed constitutional amendments.  

 

 

Under PGMA Charter change was demonized, trivialized, and junked.

  

On hindsight, I believe that under President Arroyo Charter Change from 2004 onward suffered mortally by her sponsorship of it, and by the wrong method of a Constituent Assembly without the Senate, or by the controversial People’s Initiative. On the whole, therefore, the attempts at Charter change suffered from wrong timing.

  

In 2006 the leaders of the People’s Initiative (PI) to change our presidential system to a parliamentary system gathered the required voters’ signatures in each and all the congressional districts and in the whole nation. But the Commission on Elections refused to validate the signatures. The Supreme Court by a majority vote of 8 to 7 denied the PI leaders’ petitions to compel the COMELEC to validate the signatures so that the proposed amendments could be submitted to a national plebiscite. To me, the PI exercise showed that the people are not really the sovereign source of government authority as stated in the Constitution (Article II. Section 1).

  

Despite many resolutions filed by its members, Congress failed jointly to propose amendments to the Constitution from 1996 to early 2005. President Arroyo formed the 2005 Consultative Commission on Charter Change and appointed its 55 members. I was chosen to chair the Commission.

  

We held regional consultations and then came up with our proposals for a shift to a parliamentary system, for creating autonomous territories or regions in transition to  establishing a federal republic, and for liberalizing the constitutional provisions on foreign participation in our development. Except for helping to popularize and mainstream the ideas and issues of Charter change, the serious PI exercise also failed.

  

Charter Change can be our new President’s foremost and enduring legacy.

  

For our popular and reformist new President his historic initiative would enable him to leave a major legacy of basic and enduring innovations. And also of correcting the now well known basic flaws in the 1987 Constitution, also remembered as the “Cory Constitution.” 

  

Senator Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino by his heroic defense of democracy and martyrdom hastened the collapse of the Marcos dictatorship. President Corazon Aquino led the nation in ending the Marcos dictatorship at the EDSA revolt and restoring our democracy. In his own time President Benigno S. Aquino III can reform and revitalize our democracy through his transforming leadership and historic Charter change.

  

If he takes this supreme challenge, before his term ends in 2016 we can be hopeful and confident that in due course our reformed constitutional policies and political institutions will enable our country to sustain our political, economic, and social development and modernization. We can institutionalize good governance and hasten nation-building.

 

  

  ********

Dr. Jose V. Abueva is U.P. Professor Emeritus of Political Science and Public Administration, and former U.P. president (1987-1993). He is President and Professor at Kalayaan College in Quezon City which he founded with fellow U.P. professors in 2000. He was Secretary of the 1971 Constitutional Convention and Chairman of the Legislative-Executive Military Bases Council under President Corazon Aquino. He also chaired the 2005 Consultative Commission on Charter Change.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before he was elected president of U.P. he served the United Nations University for ten years (1977-1987). He finished high school at the Central Visayan Institute in Jagna, Bohol in 1947, then obtained his A.B, (Arts-Law) cum laude from U.P. From the University of Michigan he got his M.A. in Public Administration and Ph.D. in Political Science.       

 

 
Kennedy's illness kept him from attending the funeral of his sister, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, a leadi PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Thursday, 27 August 2009

Lesson from Obama: It’s the message that counts, not the Internet                                        

By Sheila Coronel

GMANews.TV – August 26, 2009

 

For politicians who want to copy US President Barack Obama’s campaign strategy of using digital media in next year’s elections, a prominent Filipina journalist has this tip: create your message for voters first, and make sure it’s genuine.

 

In a speech at the annual Teodoro Benigno Memorial Lecture organized by the Foreign Correspondents’ Association of the Philippines, multi-awarded journalist Sheila Coronel said Obama combined digital and mobile phone technology with grassroots organizing and money to win the presidency despite being a dark horse early in the race.

 

Coronel said Obama provided the “digital template" that many politicians are likely to follow in the 2010 presidential elections. However, she stressed: “We tend to think that technology is everything but it’s not … what matters is, the message you deliver is you."

 

During the campaign, Obama was seen as a genuine and sincere political leader who managed to overcome racial and family struggles to achieve success in life, she said.

 

Obama raised $500 million online, amassed five million contacts in his Facebook page, sent personalized messages to 13 million names in his e-mail database, and even had his own specialized application on the popular gadget iPhone.

 

“More important than all of that, Obama had a message: change," Coronel said.

 

“Message, authenticity, and narrative are important," she added. She compared Obama’s life story to the tragedy suffered by former president Corazon Aquino that caught the imagination of voters in the elections held three years after her husband’s assassination.

 

Coronel is currently the director of the Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism at Columbia University in New York. She won the 2003 Ramon Magysaysay Award for journalism, literature and creative communication arts and is one of the founders of the prestigious Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.

 

Although broadcast media remains dominant in the Philippines, she said new media such as the Internet can be a “leveler" for candidates, making it possible for those who do not have money to campaign effectively without spending millions of pesos on TV ads.

 

“Our demography favors new media," Coronel said. She noted that 70 percent of the voters in next year’s elections are under the age of 45, who also make up the bulk of Internet users. Coronel cited the Youbama video sharing site created by Obama supporters in the US that was geared toward younger voters.

 

'Journalism of amateurs'

 

Even as the Internet has revolutionized the media landscape, Coronel said its impact on the journalism profession remains uncertain.

 

“One prognosis is that it will become a journalism of amateurs," she said. “Right now, everybody is a journalist," using tools such as blogs and Twitter to send out citizen’s reports from various parts of the globe.

 

“It’s decentralized. There’s no editor that says, verify this first," Coronel said.

 

By 2012, Internet users are expected to generate about 70 percent of content on the web, she reported. She added that an estimated one-fourth of the world’s population is now connected to the Internet while two-thirds have mobile phone subscriptions.

 

During the open forum, Coronel fielded questions from mass communication students from various colleges, who expressed keen interest in the future of new media.

 

She advised the youth to diversify and develop various talents such as putting up websites and becoming more entrepreneurial in their field, while creating a system that will help them filter the information they get from the web and counter-check false reports.

 

“I think citizen journalism is here to stay," Coronel said. However, professional journalists will still be needed to verify data and explain the meaning of the news to the public, she added.

 

Traditional politics

 

Even as the Internet is gaining a strong foothold in the country, Coronel cautioned digital media users about the limits of citizen journalism in the Philippines, where violence remains a constant threat especially in the provinces.

 

She cited the case of Maguindanao province, where election cheating has become entrenched. “What do you do (if someone) is pointing a gun at you? Do you take his picture with a cell phone?"

 

Traditional practices are also difficult to overcome in the country, Coronel said, citing a survey done by the Institute for Political and Electoral Reforms in 2003 that showed voters still influenced by the public servant image of candidates, political machinery, popularity, and endorsements from family and church affiliations.

 

However, she remains optimistic in the country’s political future. “There is a wellspring of belief in democracy in this country," she said, as seen in the recent outpouring of gratitude for the late former president Corazon Aquino.

 

“I think our problem is we ask the politicians to save us from our misery when they are the cause of our misery," she concluded. - GMANews.TV

  
Last Updated ( Thursday, 27 August 2009 )
 
Next >
Design by KC Web Development Team